2021 Honda Jazz vs 2021 Mazda CX-5
The 2021 Honda Jazz and 2021 Mazda CX-5 are frequently compared in the European market as they target family-oriented buyers seeking versatile vehicles, though they differ significantly in size and purpose: the Jazz is a compact hybrid supermini MPV prized for urban efficiency, while the CX-5 is a mid-size SUV emphasizing driving dynamics and space. The Jazz appeals to city dwellers with its 'Magic Seats' for exceptional practicality and low running costs, starting around €27,000, whereas the CX-5, from about €31,000, offers more power, higher ground clearance, and optional AWD for varied driving conditions. Comparisons highlight the Jazz's fuel economy edge against the CX-5's superior performance and comfort, making the choice dependent on priorities like efficiency versus space and refinement.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Category | Honda Jazz | Mazda CX-5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | Honda Jazz: 1.5 i-MMD full hybrid, 122 HP, CVT automatic, 0-100 km/h around 9.6s, top speed 173 km/h, smooth but not exciting. | Mazda CX-5: Petrol MHEV or diesel options, 150-194 HP, manual/auto, AWD available, top speed up to 208 km/h, more powerful and dynamic. | B |
| Comfort | Compact supermini with decent ride for city use, but firmer suspension and less sound insulation than SUVs. | Mid-size SUV with refined ride, higher seating, quieter cabin, and better long-distance comfort. | B |
| Technology | Hybrid-specific features, digital/TFT displays, basic infotainment with Honda Sensing suite. | Analog/TFT cluster, advanced Mazda infotainment, optional premium audio and connectivity. | Tie |
| Safety | 5-star ANCAP/Euro NCAP equivalent, 6 airbags, stability control, Honda Sensing with AEB. | 5-star rating, comprehensive suite including AEB, blind-spot monitoring on higher trims. | Tie |
| Practicality | Exceptional with Magic Seats, up to 1205L boot, low 137mm ground clearance, ideal for urban loading. | Larger 1626L max boot, higher payload (434-508kg), 193mm clearance, better for families and gear. | B |
| Running Costs | 4.5-4.8L/100km, CO2 102-108g/km, low €812-877/month estimates. | 5.6L/100km or higher, less efficient especially AWD diesels. | A |
| Resale Value | Strong Honda reliability aids retention in supermini segment. | Excellent Mazda build quality and demand maintain high residuals for SUVs. | Tie |
Strengths
2021 Honda Jazz
Outstanding fuel efficiency (4.5L/100km)
Versatile Magic Seats for practicality
Low CO2 emissions and running costs
Smooth hybrid drivetrain
2021 Mazda CX-5
Powerful engines (up to 194 HP)
Refined comfort and driving dynamics
Spacious SUV interior and boot
Optional AWD for versatility
Weaknesses
2021 Honda Jazz
Limited power (122 HP)
Lower ground clearance (137mm)
Less spacious for large families
Basic performance on highways
2021 Mazda CX-5
Higher fuel consumption (5.6L/100km)
Elevated purchase price
Less efficient in urban settings
Heavier and less nimble
Pricing Comparison
Honda Jazz
€27,000 - €32,000
Mazda CX-5
€31,000 - €42,000
The Honda Jazz offers better value with a lower starting price (€27,000 vs €31,000) and superior efficiency, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. The CX-5 justifies its premium through space, power, and SUV appeal, but higher costs tip value towards the Jazz for urban users.
Reliability
Honda Jazz
Above AverageMazda CX-5
Above Average
Both benefit from strong brand reliability; Honda's hybrid tech proves durable in Jazz models per owner forums, while Mazda's CX-5 scores well in surveys for robust engines. Minor issues like infotainment glitches reported equally, with no major red flags in European data.
Best For
Honda Jazz
Urban commuters, small families, or efficiency-focused drivers seeking low costs and clever space in a compact package.
Mazda CX-5
Families needing SUV space, power, and refinement for mixed highway/country driving with occasional off-road capability.
Final Verdict
Too Close to Call
The 2021 Honda Jazz edges in running costs and value for city use, while the Mazda CX-5 dominates in performance, comfort, and practicality for families. Choice hinges on needs: efficiency supermini vs versatile SUV. No clear winner—both excel in their segments.